And as you do it, you'll start hitting the actual notes, and eventually you can close in on them. So this type of transcription gets you to navigate the same context the musicians were playing in. There's a lot more information than just the notes that were played. But rather than worrying about the exact notes being played, study the context by just singing and playing over the song and seeing what works and what does not. Up to here, this method and yours is the same. Take the song, load it up in transcribe ( ) or similar software, pick a part. I don't disagree that this type of transcription leads to good results, and in fact, it's what you should eventually do, but I've found a different approach to transcription that to me is easier, more fun, and more powerful. How is my rhythm? Can I play to a click? Do I recognize chords as fast as I want? Can I play doublestops? Can I do funk? Counterpoint? Odd time signatures? How are my biomechanics? Bichords (that's two chords at the same time)? Symmetric scales? Microtones (instrument permitting)? Can I convey peace? Excitement? Morose? Military? Exultant? Afraid? Call and response with someone else? Between my two hands? Within one hand?Īlso it's helpful to avoid the goal of "dominating" such targets. But if you periodically step back to map the terrain, there's always something within your reach that will feel satisfying when you get it, no matter how much you already know. It's easy for beginners to find low hanging fruit, because there's so much of it. A kid is shocked to discover how great that first E major chord sounds, and experiences like that are motivating. Research, investigation, pushing boundaries get at the idea better.Īdults have a hard time learning new things largely because beginner's mind feels so alien and tedious to them. Practice really is a terrible word for it, because it suggests s dumb, inefficient way to learn. But for now, there's only a command-line interface and the user has to do that themselves. Ideally there's a graphic interface that downloads the music and lets you loop, slow down, and change the pitch. The whole process is meant to recreate the apprenticeship process that all the early Jazz masters went through. The last step is what is normally called transcribing, but the course is meant to progressively lead you to that. These "transcription" courses first ask you to loosely sing the song, then loosely improvise over it with your instruments (you can customize your own), then sing in different keys and do it more thoroughly, then improvise more closely to the actual song. Only one course for now since I've been trying to work out the process first. Trane works based on a graph, so the progression does not have to be linear. For jazz, for example, this would be something like learning African music first, then spirituals, then blues songs, then new orleans jazz, then basic standards and so on. So I think the historical development of the genre you are trying to learn is a good proxy. Trying to do it based on music theory would be ideal, but probably beyond my capacity. I am just coming up with the structure for how to define what music would depend on each other. It's now just a matter of designing the courses and polishing the user experience. So I've been hacking at this and the basic idea does work. I wanted something like you describe, but as far as I know nothing existed. That's pretty much what I've been trying to do with They would apply equally to music with 13 notes per octave. These skills, which are often called "taste", are quite temperament-agnostic. If the bass is playing a pedal tone rather than the root, you might consider including the root more important than it would be otherwise (it's common otherwise to play the third and seventh, since the audience can typically infer the fifth even if it's not in the bassline). As an accompanist your rhythm should be simpler than the drummer's or the soloist's, but should also (or rather, it often sounds good if you do) reflect any temporary motifs they introduce. Doing it right requires listening closely, because you want your dynamics (generally) to mirror the soloist's, you want to anticipate when he'll go slow or take a breath because those are the best times to say something. When you're comping, you want to be sure the listener (and the soloist) know where they are in the song, without getting in the way. Empathy is a little-taught skill that's critical to, among other things, teaching, storytelling, and music.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |